1) "Blood for Oil" is film studies scholarship that supports its argument by thinking through metonymy. What is metonymy and why is it important for analysis and creative practice?
Metonymy is a figure of speech that replaces the name of a thing with the name of something else with which it is closely associated. It’s important for analysis and creative practice because it can be used to present a set of meanings to suggest a similarity between actions or events.
2) "Blood for Oil" studies scholarship that is new historicist in its framework. What is new historicism and why does it matter?
New Historicism seeks to find meaning in a piece of work by considering the work within it that may contain ideas and assumptions of its historical era. It could shed light on a particular role or effect that the historical era of a work is trying to reproduce for others to see.
3) The article begins with an analysis of the written and aural components of the film’s opening. Why? (This analysis carries through to the analysis of Franklin, the generator, and the chain saw itself.)
The articles begins with an analysis of the written and aural components of the film’s opening because it is the most important part of the film. The whole social and political background of the the film is established in the opening with the radio station voice narrating the current situation of the time and recent issues with grave robbers, dead bodies, oil crisis, and economical crisis.
4) Corporate signage figures heavily in the argument. Why does genre matter to how we think about corporate signifiers?
Genre matters when we think about corporate signifiers because some genres could use corporate signage in a positive advertisement-type of way and other genres may use it to point out something negative about a corporation.